Gibson Law Office
LAFAYETTE: (765) 742-8440 | FORT WAYNE: (260) 739-5425 | BLOOMINGTON: (812) 269-1508 | ANDERSON: (765) 313-7313
MENU
Home
Practice Areas
Blog
Forums
Videos
About Us
Contact Us
Search for:
Blog
Archived Posts
September 2021 (
1
)
May 2020 (
1
)
April 2020 (
1
)
March 2020 (
5
)
January 2020 (
2
)
September 2019 (
1
)
August 2019 (
4
)
July 2019 (
9
)
June 2019 (
3
)
April 2019 (
1
)
February 2019 (
1
)
January 2019 (
1
)
July 2018 (
2
)
June 2018 (
2
)
August 2016 (
1
)
July 2016 (
3
)
June 2016 (
5
)
May 2016 (
3
)
April 2016 (
5
)
March 2016 (
8
)
February 2016 (
2
)
January 2016 (
1
)
September 2015 (
1
)
August 2015 (
2
)
May 2015 (
2
)
April 2015 (
3
)
January 2015 (
2
)
August 2014 (
1
)
June 2014 (
2
)
May 2014 (
3
)
April 2014 (
5
)
March 2014 (
7
)
February 2014 (
4
)
January 2014 (
6
)
December 2013 (
5
)
November 2013 (
11
)
October 2013 (
4
)
September 2013 (
4
)
August 2013 (
6
)
July 2013 (
1
)
February 2013 (
1
)
September 2012 (
5
)
August 2011 (
1
)
July 2011 (
3
)
June 2011 (
4
)
April 2011 (
1
)
December 2010 (
1
)
August 2010 (
2
)
April 2010 (
1
)
March 2010 (
1
)
January 2010 (
2
)
September 2009 (
2
)
August 2009 (
1
)
July 2009 (
2
)
March 2009 (
3
)
February 2009 (
1
)
January 2009 (
3
)
Tag Cloud
abuse
access
arrest
attorney
background
battery
breath
check
child
Class
common
community
computer
conduct
conference
conversion
corrections
crime
criminal
D
dealing
deportation
down
driving
drug
drugs
DUI
DWI
encounters
entrapment
Home
>
Blog
>
June 2018
>
Indiana Court Holds Two Minute Delay for K-9 Search Unlawful
Indiana Court Holds Two Minute Delay for K-9 Search Unlawful
Police cannot delay a traffic stop in order to conduct a dog sniff for drugs without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that even a delay of less than two minutes violates the 4
th
Amendment.
In this case, a woman was stopped for speeding by a police officer. After obtaining the woman’s driver’s license, registration, and proof of insurance, he placed those items on his car seat and removed his trained canine. The police dog then conducted a free-air sniff and alerted to the presence of drugs. According to the officer, the canine sniff process lasted approximately one-and-a-half to two minutes.
The officer then searched the car and found of bag containing methamphetamine. The officer ran the routine checks of the woman’s license and registration after the search of her vehicle was complete.
After being charged with possession of methamphetamine, a Class D felony (this offense is now a
Level 6 felony
), the defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence alleging that the search was unlawful.
Oftentimes the officer who makes the traffic stop calls a second officer to conduct the dog sniff while he is processing the traffic ticket. However, in this case, the officer chose to suspend the traffic stop to perform the canine sniff himself. The Court of Appeals concluded that the traffic stop was clearly delayed by the dog sniff, and that even a two minute delay increased the duration of the seizure outside the scope of the traffic stop. As a result, the search of the defendant’s car was unlawful. The evidence of illegal drug possession was suppressed and the methamphetamine charge dismissed.
Was the Search of My Vehicle After a K-9 Sniff Illegal?
Police often call for a K-9 unit when conducting an infraction traffic stop, with the hopes of detecting illegal drugs. However, police cannot delay the time needed to process the traffic stop to conduct the dog sniff unless there is reasonable suspicion of a crime. Police often claim to smell
marijuana
to justify extending a traffic stop for a K-9 sniff.
How to Defend a Possession of Marijuana or Controlled Substance Charge After a K-9 Sniff
Defending drug charges after a K-9 sniff requires a detailed analysis of the timeline of events. Dispatch logs should include the precise time a traffic stop was initiated and when a canine arrived on the scene. Police video is increasingly common and may also provide helpful evidence to a defense attorney. If the traffic stop was delayed to conduct a search for marijuana, methamphetamines or other controlled substances, the search may be unlawful.
An Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney is Critical in Dog-Sniff Cases
Gibson Law Office has extensive experience defending dog sniff cases, including in Tippecanoe, Miami, and Pulaski County. Indiana Courts have trended toward defendant-friendly outcomes protecting against unlawful vehicle searches. It’s important to be represented by a criminal attorney who has experience analyzing traffic stop timelines and applying the most recent cases. With offices in Lafayette and Fort Wayne, our criminal attorneys defend drug cases statewide.
Please enable JavaScript to view the
comments powered by Disqus.
comments powered by
Disqus
Posted:
6/27/2018 4:40:57 PM
by
Brett Gibson
Filed under:
attorney
,
drugs
,
vehicle
Sitemap
Home
Practice Areas
Videos
About Us
Contact Us
Contact Us
Email:
info@bbgibson.com
Information
Lafayette
Gibson Law Office
133 N. 4
th
St.
Suite 73
Lafayette, IN 47901
Phone: (765) 742-8440
Bloomington
Gibson Law Office
115 N College Ave
Suite 265
Bloomington, IN 47404
Phone: (812) 269-1508
Fort Wayne
Gibson Law Office
701 S. Clinton St.
Suite 300
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
Phone: (260) 739-5425
Anderson
Gibson Law Office
1106 Meridian St
Suite 424
Anderson, IN 46016
Phone: (765) 313-7313
Email:
info@bbgibson.com
Powered by
Kentico CMS
| Built by
BizStream
Copyright ©2019 Gibson Law Office